Closing Debate | Tech Competency will Trump Legal Skills in Tomorrow’s Lawyer

12 Mar 2026
Track 1

As technology reshapes the legal practice, a debate emerges: will technological competency overshadow traditional legal skills in defining the lawyer of the future? This debate examines the competing forces of automation, artificial intelligence, data-driven decision-making and digital client services, and whether these will become the dominant measure of professional capability. One side argues that mastering legal technology will be the decisive differentiator—enabling greater efficiency, accuracy, access to justice, and competitive advantage.

The opposing view contends that core legal reasoning, advocacy, ethics, negotiation and human judgment remain irreplaceable, and that technology is merely a tool to enhance, not replace, legal expertise. Through contrasting perspectives, this session challenges participants to consider where the real value of tomorrow’s lawyer will lie: in coding and computational fluency, or in timeless human skills that technology cannot replicate.

Chairperson
Terri Mottershead
Terri Mottershead, Director, Digital Enablement, Ashurst Advance
Speakers
Jiamin Leow
Jiamin Leow, Deputy Director (Legal Faculty), Singapore Academy of Law
Gary Beh
Gary Beh, Partner, Corporate Withers KhattarWong
Katrina Gowans
Katrina Gowans, Group Counsel, APA Group and Advisory Board Member, Centre for Legal Innovation
Brian Tang
Brian Tang, Co-Chair ALITA & Founding Executive Director, LITE Lab@HKU